The Saga of Becoming Fruitful

Posts Tagged ‘ICSI’

Detailed SART IVF Stats Comparison

Written by Arpee on September 30, 2008 – 9:02 pm -

I’ve been looking at IVF stats from SART for sometime now and just like last Saturday’s post, I thought that was it. This weekend was the only time I stared at it long enough to discover that the IVF stats can be sliced further according to the diagnosis of the IVF patients. The per Diagnosis-sliced data was very interesting.

I lined up our known diagnosis to the Diagnosis Types in the SART database:

• Tubal Factor
• Ovulatory Dysfunction - Anovulation
• Diminished Ovarian Reserve - Advanced Maternal Age
• Endometriosis
• Uterine Factor
• Male Factor
• Other Factor
• Unknown Factor
• Multiple Female Factors - Anovulation, PCOS, Advanced Maternal Age
• Female and Male Factors -Anovulation, PCOS, Advanced Maternal Age, Low Sperm Morphology
  

I used 2006 SART IVF data from:

• TFC - Texas Fertility Center
• CCRM - Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine
• SIRM-D - Sher Institute of Reproductive Medicine in Dallas, TX (since they are the only ones who publish to SART among the various locations of the SIRM. I’m showing how SIRM stats are presented later.)

Anyhow… Using these Diagnosis Types, I went to Select Diagnosis on the upper right corner of the SART stats (under the Diagnosis Frequency). For each of the related Diagnosis above, SART gives the stats for that particular Diagnosis alone. Here are the captured images of each clinic’s start for each of the related Diagnosis.

I summarized what I got from these captured images below:

CCRM had the most patients (91 vs 47 TFC) aged 38-40 years old with potentially related cases as mine. It might be a long shot, but this comparison may mean that CCRM has more experience on cases similar to mine. And perhaps may be able to help me more???

CCRM had the highest % cycles (78% vs 36% TFC) and most number of patients (964 vs 243 TFC) of all ages who had ICSI. This may be an indication of how much ICSI opportunity/experience the embryologists have for the clinics and thus how skillful they are.

CCRM also had the most # of cycles where PGD was used AT 234. Although TFC has 5X more cycles than SIRM-D, they have almost the same # of cylces where PGD was used (about 20). This may be an indication of how much biopsy and freezing/vitrification opportunity/experience the embryologists have for the clinics and thus how skillful they are. This may also be an indication how cutting edge or on top of technology the clinics/labs and doctors/embryologists are.

CCRM has the highest live births per cycle, followed by TFC and SIRM-D

Of course, doing this is tricky because:
1) Without clear knowledge on how each of the SART Diagnosis Types are defined, I am guessing what my diagnosis corresponds to.
2) Unless the SART Diagnosis Types are defined clearly with a common standard reference to be used by different clinics, different clinics may have different interpretation of the SART Diagnosis clinic and thus categorized their cases differently. This would be a major error in assumption when making “apple-to-apple comparison.

This is all I’ve got, so I’m going to use the information for making the comparison anyway. It is better than nothing at all.

Tags: ccrm, Diagnosis, ICSI, IVF, live birth, PGD, SART, sirm, stats, tfc
Posted in IVF, In Between Cycles, Infertility Learnings | No Comments »